Let's be clear about something. Ozzy was robbed. There's no question that Yul is a deserving winner. It's been a long time, in fact, since the finals contained two contestants who were both worthy of the prize, and had I been on that jury I'm not sure how I'd have voted. Yul played a brilliant game, but Ozzy dominated the challenges and you have to respect that.
Ozzy wasn't robbed by Yul, or by the jury. He was cheated out of his million by Mark Burnett.
In any other season of Survivor, Ozzy would have won the prize. But this time, three people made it into the finals. And while Becky was a complete non-factor in the vote, that rule change cost Ozzy one million dollars. I make that statement based on a key assumption, which isn't at all far-fetched-- that like every other individual immunity challenge this season, Ozzy would have won the additional one required to pare the final four down to three. We already saw that he won the final endurance challenge. Assuming the four to three transition went as we saw it, with a fire-building tie-breaker eliminating Sundra, Ozzy would have had the ability to choose the person to stand next to in the finals. Only a complete idiot would take Yul along for the ride, and Ozzy's not a complete idiot. So had the game progressed to its normal conclusion, Ozzy would have beaten Becky 10-0. Instead, Ozzy never got a chance to get Yul out of the game, and lost the big bucks by the slimmest possible margin.
It's one thing to throw surprises into the game, but to change the fundamental structure of the endgame without telling players in advance is dirty pool. Those guys are forming strategies based on everything coming down to a final two contestants. The dynamics of a final three are completely different, and people might have played differently had they known that was the game they were in. The players knew something was up when Brad made the jury so early, but in their wildest speculations I doubt they thought there would be three finalists. At least Ozzy got the car, thus keeping the curse of the car alive.
Posted by Peter at December 18, 2006 11:35 AMThose were my thoughts exactly regarding the 3-person final, a few minutes after the vote. I wasn't unhappy that Yul won, and I think that even he recognizes how incredibly lucky he got this time, skilled though he was in his gameplay.
I think the Hidden Immunity Idol concept, while it has its good points, needs some tweaking for next time they use it (for All-Stars?) Maybe it has to be good for a limited time only, so that it's "use it or lose it," or maybe it should be a bit bulkier and harder to conceal, so that tribemates might be inclined to steal it when the person is not paying attention.
Posted by: RichM on December 18, 2006 02:39 PMThe rules prohibit players from stealing the idol. When Yul found the idol this season, they showed the sheet of information that came with it. One of the line items was something like "The hidden immunity idol cannot be stolen from you."
Once the immunity idol has been found, the whole Exile Island thing loses its interest. They're making 2 immunity idols available next season, so perhaps that will stir things up.
Posted by: Peter on December 18, 2006 03:12 PMYes. You're right. I hadn't thought of that.
But that's not why I write. I can't remember anyone commenting on your constant stream of titular puns, good/bad as they are.
So: this one is one of the good/bad - est in a while. Congratulations.
Posted by: Michael on December 18, 2006 06:00 PMRe: stealing the HII: Why do the rules prohibit something like that? Is it only because players aren't supposed to take anything else belonging to other players? (Though there was that business with Rupert and the shoes...)
They think two hidden immunity idols are better than one? How about if they have sixteen of them then?
Did the Cook Islands survivors ever express a sense of real hunger? It seemed like they were eating all the time when they were on the beaches.
Posted by: RichM on December 19, 2006 12:27 PMif i recall correctly the teams got fire and fishing gear much earlier than usual. i suspect this allowed them to eat a lot more than previous seasons, but they still lost a lot of weight, so they weren't eating as much as it might seem.
i have no problem with yul beating ozzy. ozzy was a great survivor and lots of fun to watch, but yul outplayed him.
Posted by: dana on December 20, 2006 09:24 AMYou point out that the players knew Brad was an early jury member, and that there would be 10 jury members if there were two finalists. That's certainly a clue that something funky was afoot; another clue was the double elimination. Ozzy could conceivably have known that he should not count on solely winning immunity challenges and would have to scramble to curry favor with the jury.
It's also clear from the early Brad selection and the way the season unfolded that this twist was planned from the beginning, so it was not aimed at Ozzy per se.
All that said, I actually agree with you that Ozzy should have won. I'd have voted for him.
Posted by: Stephen on December 23, 2006 11:13 PMI hadn't thought about the fact that Ozzy likely would have won had they had the traditional final two.
But to suggest that Ozzy might have formed a strategy on getting to the final two is a stretch. As was made abundantly clear in the discussion afterwards, Ozzy wasn't much of a thinker.
Stephen makes a good point about the jury count being a clue.
I, too, thought that Ozzy would win without question. But then when Adam claimed that if Yul voted Jonathan off first that he would vote for Yul on the jury, I thought it was just an idle promise. This ended up being the deciding vote.
I thought that the two lawyers would make more of Ozzy's claim that the jury should vote for him because he went all out and won so many challenges. He certainly didn't give it his best effort when he orchestrated his tribe's deliberate loss to get rid of Billy. He even mentioned this at the final tribal council.
Posted by: Exile islander on December 29, 2006 09:47 AMI think there's a problem with your assumption that Ozzy wins the extra challenge. Not that he wouldn't win, if it was a physical challenge, but the fact that it would be yet another physical challenge. And then I think Yul would have the argument that he was "robbed", given that all the individual challenges were so dependent on physical prowess this season.
I think the fact that the rules can (and do) change all the time is part of the distinction between game and gameshow (for better or worse).
I think both Yul and Ozzy were deserving, though I was glad to see Yul win. I was a little surprised that he won because Adam decided his deal (to get Jonathan out) was binding, though I think the fact that he even made that deal with Yul (and not Ozzy or anyone else) showed the leadership advantage Yul had.
Also, do you think it would kill them to have a list of all the players names somewhere during the voting so players wouldn't have to guess how to spell their opponents' names?
Posted by: alexsim on January 3, 2007 04:55 PM