October 03, 2006

Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip

When Sports Night first aired, I ignored it. I don't care about sports themselves, let alone television shows about sports. A television show about a television show about sports? Please. I'm not into politics either, but I gave The West Wing a chance anyway-- and discovered that it actually made the world of politics interesting. So when Sports Night popped up in reruns on Comedy Central, I gave it a shot. Turns out it wasn't really about a sports show at all-- that was just the backdrop for a very sharply-written comedy. This season Aaron Sorkin's taken the ensemble hour-long drama format of The West Wing, crossed it with the behind-the-scenes-of-a-television-show setting of Sports Night, and produced Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip-- a show that threatens to crumble under the considerable weight of its own gravitas.

The West Wing was essentially a wish-fulfillment show, offering a look at what it might be like to have incredibly smart, dedicated people in the White House committed to making the country a better place without kowtowing to big business. Martin Sheen's President Jed Bartlett was always the smartest guy in the room, backed by a staff of brilliant and preternaturally quick-witted over-achievers. It offered viewers a glimpse into a mysterious world that affects us all yet about which we know very little. The White House backdrop opened the doors to provocative, relevant storylines that often had real-world analogues, and viewers could play "what-if?" along with the show. It was fantasy-- no White House could ever be as competent and idealistic as Bartlett's-- but a fantasy that resonated with American's yearning for government the way it "ought" to be.

Studio 60 is also a wish-fulfillment show, positing a network president who actually stands up for creative expression and freedom of speech, who goes to the mat for her producers, and who cares about quality and integrity at least as much as she does ratings and market share. But nobody outside of the television industry cares. Oh, sure, I wish there really were network execs like her, imposing a coward tax on advertisers for pulling out in the wake of the protest du jour. But in the end-- and this is me saying this-- it's just television. Viewers can only be expected to invest so much of themselves in a show about a sketch comedy show. These people are not fighting for education reform or keeping terrorists from blowing up the Golden Gate Bridge. They're performing "Pimp My Trike."

Bradley Whitford and Matthew Perry are outstanding, and Amanda Peet is also interesting. But Timothy Busfield is criminally under-utilized, Stephen Weber's corporate chairman hits only one note and cries out for some nuance, and none of the "big three" performers in the show-within-a-show seem as talented as we're told they are. We should never see any of the actual skits being performed-- they're forever doomed to be less funny than those concocted by cadres of cannibalisticly competitive writers and performers on real sketch comedy shows. The action should remain behind-the-scenes, and therein lies the problem. As great as the characters might be, as fantastic as the writing might be, the premise cannot sustain the life-or-death tone we've seen so far. This show needs to be more Ally McBeal, more Boston Legal. Sports Night worked because it was all about the funny. It took us behind the scenes to find humor in the characters, to laugh at the antics of a third-rated show on a third-rated network.

Unless you work in television, I question whether anyone can really empathize with all the hand-wringing about focus groups and market share and audience retention and how much of a pressure-cooker putting on a weekly sketch comedy show really is. Studio 60's crisis-laden tone comes off as the latest example of self-infatuated Hollywood navel-gazing. The writers, actors, and producers of the show eat and breathe show business. It's their entire world, and they seem to believe that viewers with no stake in the industry will care about it as much as they do. And by the way, I've got this great idea for a television show about the pressures and machinations behind the scenes creating software at a major software company.

Posted by Peter at October 3, 2006 11:10 AM
Comments

Dude, it's a well-written show about interesting people. What's not to like?

I give it a big thumbs up. It's not Lost, but it's just fun to hear lots of fast-talking people have fun with the English language.

Posted by: Don on October 3, 2006 01:15 PM

Oh, I agree-- the pleasure of hearing Sorkin's rat-a-tat dialogue is good enough for me. But not, I fear, for enough of America to have the series finish a complete season, let alone get picked up for a second. My comments come from a standpoint of enlightened self-interest, of the "keep Aaron Sorkin's dialogue on the air" variety.

Posted by: Peter on October 3, 2006 02:01 PM

I've got this great idea for a television show about the pressures and machinations behind the scenes creating software at a major software company.

I'd watch that!

Posted by: Doug Orleans on October 3, 2006 02:31 PM

Peter, it is interesting that you mention a show about the software industry. I was talking to another person at work and he visits many universities to improve the C.S. cirriculum. One thing we talked about was the decline in students. He mentioned that in a conversation with one professor she pointed out that kids over time have had many shows that have inspired them to be doctors, cops, lawyers, crime scene investigators, etc... There hasn't been a show about computer science. Nothing to make it interesting for youth. I think the time is right (ripe) for a show about the software industry.

Posted by: Troy on October 4, 2006 09:56 PM

There hasn't been a show on the software industry, because it's inherently undramatic.

Posted by: Nathan on October 5, 2006 12:19 PM

I agree with your review, Peter (I speak as a huge fan of West Wing and of Sports Night, though I've never been interested in sports until this year, when Jordi's got me into baseball).

The show's good enough for me to enjoy it, still, but the ratings drop from the first week is not a good sign. It would be a much better show if Sorkin would lighten the tone. And the heavy-handed dramatic soundtrack? How I wish he'd kill it. It's a reminder every time that this is about whether a comedy sketch is funny, not about war and people's ability to go to college and the rest of the West Wing topics.

Posted by: Robin on October 6, 2006 10:17 AM

There hasn't been a show on the software industry, because it's inherently undramatic.

I've seen a fair amount of drama, office politics, angst, conflict, etc. over the years. It wouldn't take much to nudge it up a notch into TV-worthy material. :)

Posted by: Jessica on October 9, 2006 02:52 PM

None of that is in any way specific to the software industry, Jessica. That's just general office politics, which has been done. I'd have a really hard time caring if our hero had to stay late to get some code done so her boss could make a deadline, or if she had to track down a pesky bug that the user swore was causing a problem but only occurred intermittently. Not terribly gripping stuff to watch as far as I can see.

Posted by: Nathan on October 9, 2006 11:47 PM

Interesting points, but I'm a Sorkin junkie. I just love his dialog and interesting ideas. I love the fact that I occasionally have to pause the show to savor the nuance of the dialog that just hit like a hurricane.

Add that to the fact that last week's show (West Coast Delay) was just laugh-out-loud funny. Really funny. It's the first time in a long long time I've still been laughing for a few minutes after the show was over.

Great actors, (some) great characters, great writer, great directing... what's not to love?

Posted by: Jesse on October 13, 2006 11:21 AM
Post a comment