May 14, 2006

Homeless, But Not Broke

It should have been Terry.

Update: Because a couple of readers asked so nicely in the comments, some more thoughts. Of the final four contestants, the game could have gone to any of them but Danielle. The jury rightly snubbed her utter lack of game. Like Vescepia before her, Danielle survived to the end not because of her endearing personality, strong relationships, keen strategic thinking, or impressive performance in challenges, but because everyone else always had bigger fish to fry. That steady beeping you heard throughout the game was Danielle backing into the finals. As we saw in the reunion, the cash was Terry's had he just won the immunity challenge and gotten to the finals. And had Cirie won the fire-building challenge, she'd have won the game: Aras would have won the final immunity challenge and taken her with him to the finals, where the jury would have danced a merry jig as they unanimously bestowed the prize upon her.

The final immunity challenge was horrible. Burnett hit on right on the mark his very first at bat with the stand-on-the-stump challenge from season 1, and he continued to stay true to its essence with all of the "how badly do you want it?" physical exhaustion and willpower challenges that followed. I thought they stumbled last season with a challenge that so obviously favored taller players over shorter ones-- with her lanky frame wedged against the supports, Danielle never seemed to be struggling at all while Stephanie gave it everything she had-- but this time their pratfall channeled Chevy Chase. Endurance had nothing to do with this challenge, it was entirely about balance. It wasn't enough to "want it" this time. Cirie would have been gone on the first platform. This time the advantage was with the shorter players, not to mention the freaking yoga instructor-- Terry never had a chance. On any other season, Terry would have walked away a millionaire.

A note to sanctimonious flower-child Courtney: There is no high road. You wanted the money just as much as everyone else, and you lost. Where do you get off lecturing others about their life's journey? I doubt even Probst was fooled by your gibberish. Good riddance.

They're giving Exile Island another try next season-- perhaps the immunity idol will come into play this time. And was anyone else surprised they burned the torches, which they usually auction off for pediatric AIDS?

Posted by Peter at May 14, 2006 10:32 PM
Comments

Boo hiss, that's all from you?

(If he'd been a *real* player and given Danielle the immunity idol, he'd have his million)

Posted by: Arnott on May 15, 2006 1:12 AM

No, he wouldn't. She cut him because she was afraid his "I dominated!" argument would find resonance over her "I rate myself a 9 out of 10 on the challenges even though I skated through the whole game" argument.

If he'd given her the idol, she would have cut him faster, because not only did he dominate, but he would have also established himself as loyal/willing to risk it all for his promises, etc.

Of course, that's just my opinion.

And I second the hiss in Peter's direction. More insightful commentary, please!

Posted by: Danny on May 15, 2006 8:55 AM

They've burned 'torches' on the last show of every season so far. As to whether they are the actual torches that were carried to tribal councils, I doubt it. I would bet they were duplicate torches, because, as you mentioned, they usually auction off the real ones....as they are doing again this year.

Posted by: Heath on May 16, 2006 5:24 AM

I am not a regular watcher of Survivor, so some of you may be able to help me with this question: Are the challenges fixed in advance? Or do the producers change them depending on who are left in the game, or even (gasp!) who they want to favor?

Posted by: antkam on May 16, 2006 1:48 PM

antkam,

Because of the quiz show scandals in the 50's (and no, I'm not referring to Rob Morrow's "East Coast" accent in the movie, Quiz Show, though, I must admit, I love that weird, bad accent that he does� �Ah you telling me they gafe you the anshersh?�), all game shows - which is what Survivor is considered to be in the TV universe - *must* be set in stone in advance, with back-up plans also set in stone in advance.

Some challenges - especially in previous seasons - have certainly felt like they were ingeniously tailored for that particular week, just the perfect challenge to keep that on-the-bubble player... or knock down that dominator. But this only illustrates Mark Burnett's obvious pact with the devil, and not jury-rigging the show (well, the challenges part, anyway).

How this is enforced, I don't know. There is, I'm sure, a BOATload of legal hoohaw that gets dotted and crossed and checked and counterchecked before any season gets off the ground. I suppose there might be way to skirt around that, but with HUGE ratings and a one million dollar payoff, I doubt they screw around.

Posted by: Arnott on May 16, 2006 7:37 PM

btw, the charity isn't pediatric aids this time. i don't recall what it is though.

Posted by: dana on May 17, 2006 1:02 PM

I know this is the wrong place to put this, but...

T-TOW!

Posted by: Arnott on May 19, 2006 1:02 AM